Metaphysics
114 flashcards by MentisLibrary
The core debates about what exists and what it is like: universals, identity and persistence, modality and essence, causation, time, free will, mind and body, parts and wholes, and realism. For students in a first metaphysics course.
- What question is metaphysics asking?
- What there is, and what it is like, at the most general level: which kinds of thing exist and what their most basic features are. Aristotle called it first philosophy, the study of being as being.
- Ontology
- The study of what exists and of the most general categories things fall under. An ontology is also the particular list of kinds a given theory commits itself to.
- Quine's criterion of ontological commitment
- To be is to be the value of a bound variable. A theory is committed to whatever must exist for its regimented first-order sentences to come out true.
- Substance, in the classical sense
- A thing that exists in its own right and bears properties, as against a property, which exists only in something else. Aristotle's primary substances are individual things like this horse.
- Bundle theory of objects
- An object just is a bundle of co-instantiated properties, with no underlying bearer. There is nothing more to a lemon than the yellowness, sourness, shape and the rest, held together.
- Bare particular (substratum)
- A thing considered apart from all its properties, posited as what individuates one object from another that is qualitatively identical to it. It has no nature of its own.
- Abstract vs concrete objects
- Concrete objects are located in space and time and enter causal relations; abstract objects, if they exist, do neither. The line is drawn differently by different authors and resists a clean definition.
- Platonism about mathematical objects
- Numbers and sets exist mind-independently, outside space and time, and mathematical statements are true or false because of how they are.
- Mathematical fictionalism
- Mathematical statements are literally false, since there are no numbers, but they are useful fictions that let us describe the physical world efficiently.
- Ontological parsimony
- The methodological rule that a theory positing fewer kinds of entity is preferable, other things being equal. Qualitative parsimony, fewer kinds, is usually weighted more heavily than quantitative, fewer things.
- Aristotle's categories
- Ten most general kinds under which anything can fall: substance, quantity, quality, relation, place, time, position, having, doing, and being affected. Everything said of a subject falls into one of them.
- Is existence a property?
- Kant argued that it is not a real predicate: saying a thing exists adds nothing to the concept of it, but posits an instance of that concept. Modern logic follows him by treating existence as a quantifier.
- Meinong's theory of objects
- Every thought has an object, including thoughts of golden mountains and round squares, so there are objects that do not exist. Being an object is separated from existing.
- Grounding
- A non-causal relation of metaphysical dependence: one fact holds in virtue of another. It is what philosophers mean when they say the mental is grounded in the physical, or a whole in its parts.
- The problem of universals
- Distinct things can share a feature. Two red apples are alike in a way that seems to call for explanation. Is there one entity, redness, present in both, or only two particulars that resemble each other?
- Platonic realism about universals
- Universals exist independently of their instances, outside space and time. Particular things are what they are by participating in the Forms, which they only imperfectly resemble.
- Aristotelian (immanent) realism
- Universals exist, but only in the things that instantiate them. There are no uninstantiated universals, and a universal is wholly present in each of its many instances.
- Nominalism about universals
- Only particulars exist. What a set of similar things share is not an entity but a predicate that applies to them, or membership in a class.
- Resemblance nominalism
- Properties are analysed away in terms of primitive resemblance among particulars. To be red is to resemble the red things closely enough, with resemblance taken as basic and unanalysed.
- Trope theory
- Properties are particulars, not universals: the redness of this apple is one entity and the redness of that apple another. Similar tropes resemble but are numerically distinct.
- One over many argument
- Because many things can be one in kind, there must be one entity they share. It is the classic argument for universals: the shared feature is offered as the best explanation of the shared truth.
- Third man argument
- If a Form is required to explain what many large things share, and the Form of Largeness is itself large, then a further Form is needed to cover the Form and its instances, and so on without end.
- Bradley's regress
- If a relation ties a thing to its property, something must tie the relation to the thing, and so on forever. The tie itself always needs a further tie.
- Determinable and determinate
- A determinable is a general property fixed only within a range; a determinate is a fully specific way of having it. Every determinate necessarily brings its determinable with it.
- Sparse vs abundant properties
- Abundant properties correspond to every meaningful predicate, however gerrymandered. Sparse or natural properties are the ones that carve nature at its joints and do explanatory work.
- Numerical vs qualitative identity
- Numerically identical means being one and the same thing. Qualitatively identical means merely being exactly alike. Two new coins can be qualitatively identical while remaining two things.
- Leibniz's law (indiscernibility of identicals)
- If a and b are one and the same thing, then whatever is true of a is true of b. It is close to uncontroversial, and puzzles that seem to break it usually rest on a misdescription.
- Identity of indiscernibles
- The converse of Leibniz's law: if a and b share every property, they are the same thing. It is disputed, because it seems to rule out by fiat a universe of two exactly similar things.
- Ship of Theseus
- A ship has every plank replaced over time. The repaired ship seems to be the original by continuity, yet a ship rebuilt from the discarded planks seems to be the original by material composition.
- Endurantism
- An object persists by being wholly present at each moment it exists. The whole thing, not a part of it, is there today and was there yesterday.